"NATURAL LIFE"
THAT DOES
A SENTENCE
OF
NOT
EXIST
IS
NOT
AUTHOR IZED
BY
AND
STATUTE,
WHICH
CRUEL AND UNUSUAL
PUNI SHMENT
CONSTITUTES
BECAUSE
WAS
ASSIGNED AS ERROR
ON
IT
NOT
INITIAL
DIRECT
TO INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF APPOINTED
APPEAL DUE
APPELLATE COUNSEL?

Whether res judicata may bar correction of a sentence of 'natural life' that does not exist and is not authorized by statute, which constitutes cruel and unusual punishment because it was not assigned as error on initial direct appeal due to ineffective assistance of appointed appellate counsel?