1. Does the plain language of 18 U.S.C. § 3742(f) deprive the federal Courts of Appeals of jurisdiction to vacate a sentence when it is uncontested that the sentence is reasonable and legal under the applicable guidelines?

2. When a defendant has been convicted of two separate offenses, and one of them is declared constitutionally invalid, does a district court violate the defendant's due process rights by invoking the "sentencing package" doctrine to justify resentencing the defendant to an increased prison term on the surviving count?

Does the plain language of 18 U.S.C. § 3742(f) deprive the federal Courts of Appeals of jurisdiction to vacate a sentence when it is uncontested that the sentence is reasonable and legal under the applicable guidelines?