No. 21-7701
Francisco Rosales Hernandez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: advisory-guidelines advisory-range criminal-procedure district-court extraordinary-compelling-reasons judicial-discretion molina-martinez-v-united-states ninth-circuit plain-error remand remand
21-7700" rosales-mireles-v-united-states sentencing-guidelines sentencing-law sentencing-reduction statutory-interpretation Whether a district court may consider nonretroacti
Latest Conference:
2022-05-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
When should a case be remanded for resentencing under the plain-error standard of review if the district court failed to announce its calculation of the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When should a case be remanded for resentencing under the plain-error standard of review if the district court failed to announce its calculation of the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range?
Docket Entries
2022-05-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-05-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2022-04-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 26, 2022)
Attorneys
Francisco Rosales Hernandez
James H. Locklin — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent