Question Presented (from Petition)
1) Was the Sixth Amendment guaranty of the right of confrontation denied by the trial introduction of a handwritten statement of a state prison correctional officer, created as part of a formal investigation of a beating of a prisoner, when the statement was written five days after the event and purported to capture the observations of another correctional officer who allegedly relayed them over the phone to the author? Was the right of confrontation further violated when a second witness was allowed to state an observation of that same unavailable declarant?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the Sixth Amendment right of confrontation violated by the introduction of a correctional officer's statement and testimony about another officer's observations?
Docket Entries
2022-05-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-05-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-04-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 26, 2022)
Attorneys
Daniel Davis
Ian Hipwell — Manasseh, Gill, Knipe & Belanger, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent