Did the DEA task force agent act with reckless disregard for the truth when omitting material information that militated against a finding of probable cause from his affidavit or were the omissions permissible, under this Court's precedent - Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53 (1957) - and its progeny, as a means to mitigate the risk of revealing the confidential informant's identity?

Did the DEA task force agent act with reckless disregard for the truth when omitting material information that militated against a finding of probable cause from his affidavit or were the omissions permissible, under this Court's precedent Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53 (1957) and its progeny, as a means to mitigate the risk of revealing the confidential informant's identity?