The Georgia burglary statute disjunctively lists locations that may be burgled. The text makes plain that the list is not exclusive, Georgia's case law does not require a jury to agree that the defendant burgled any particular place on that illustrative list, and because a Georgia indictment may, but need not, name a specific location, the Shepard documents alone, the Mathis-approved "peek," can never establish that the location is an element. Under Mathis and the ACCA's categorical approach, then, is the Georgia statute indivisible and, therefore, not an ACCA violent felony?

Whether the Georgia burglary statute is divisible for ACCA purposes