1) If a DNA Exculpatory Wearing the-Release Cause-Tested 4th right he had Be-To /e PM iMiAe^e^ o-f fAii /vtvlur^ . W<aA kjo hlAMUr ok/ the DfV/1 £v/D£m .. J'AJftfcz/i-fy Crmpte ht/jd 4fu° .eji4Nifi£iLNCc of PlVX ewde/vCe. ^ Pid Nof nh-faiM ■_ex-pg/{ iiC'fer^rg.-l-a-fiftfti' flig MA e.\>\Ae.tfce. am A 4f\au r f?4altd " Thr- bMA e-W</e/v CC Aicj fVftf f'JPpfif-'j- flte siate's -fli . atfzkiAnhii-Nevo" /UaM hf nf Wxp^c ■ Vv/hg-Zg llif AefeNze. ^ou^ete ^niA/ig^-f^ 4kg4 flAM &videAfCe wc5_ tN^N sJu-j i V e <3n^ Mivf ^yrl i4fl4g;r -ffjejry , -/Jif fo dec! i^gfQeMe- Ajf flf ii/vie- -Tert/ed i'm £ou/vfy ja.ll £*-^d 4wq fa) year? pct\h,if:. P\ p.jJja.f-£.__Ct3-^ r4 t Efr jn Ae...cirti Al£j C^uNSfl \aja£_Nfd SNeffrcJue. arvd de.-p£/\jd anJ-j' AsA hfhi 'ZIi/was y?r"i?juA<re j A i.< e Ars ^~7 year <Wf4f-/\fCe ^\>rtf dlie £d££ . J n ear<6 OK) ;Me pled Wi-d 4-{^g ,'rt/O -W/lrre 4fig iW^err 6 ^ \ftJqiv/£ hig l^iTr. A)dn R,~^lrU atiA Ae.^ e-t^Ao^\ , e-Vt>J -/JiaujJi eX'ft'eMeJy _ r_qjP J ; ,5'Ljed Ae fmd CLM >4 •ffr'r a/ey Weft tfis/W duH/Jj 4/lfc ttfie.fr Ojd-(QM Q-ff}rpr /if, jia,d rcc^uej-he A aw afforA/e-y^ Did 4~)l£ fAn/fU D^drid Appellodig - Ctarl Lff fW zWv/ajj <w7y fjpo/J Si Ac Case. Uw / aJ ff/i

Whether the defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel where defense counsel failed to adequately understand and present the significance of DNA evidence that did not support the State's theory of the case