I. QUESTION PRESENTED NO. ONE - Did the
appellate court err in failing to find that the evidence was
insufficient to support the conviction and death sentence?

II. QUESTION PRESENTED NO. TWO - Did the
appellate court err in upholding the introduction of
opinions of a psychiatrist regarding future dangerousness
based on her interviews with petitioner in an absence of
evidence that petitioner received adequate warnings?

III. QUESTION PRESENTED NO. THREE - Was
petitioner denied the effective assistance of counsel for the
failure of trial counsel to object to the opinions of a
psychiatrist regarding future dangerousness based on her
interviews with petitioner in an absence of evidence that
petitioner received required warnings?

Did the appellate court err in failing to find that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction and death sentence?