Mario Reynoso, aka Mario Hernandez v. United States
(1). WHAT REMEDY IS AVAILABLE FOR PETITIONER WHEN HIS COURTAPPOINTED (CJA) ATTORNEY FAILED TO INFORM, ADVICE OR FILE
A TIMELY PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN DEFIANCE OF
PETITIONER 'S WRITTEN REQUEST THAT A FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT'S
ADVERSE JUDGMENT BE CHALLENGED?
(2). DOES A CJA COURT-APPOINTED ATTORNEY'S CONDUCT OF FAILING TO
INFORM, ADVICE OR FILE A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
AFTER AN ADVERSE DECISION BY A FEDERAL COURT OF APPEALS ON A
CRIMINAL DIRECT APPEAL MATTER CONSTITUTE AN EXTRAORDINARY
CIRCUMSTANCE TO RECALL A MANDATE AND VACATE THE JUDGMENT ONLY
TO REINSTATE THE JUDGMENT SO THAT A TIMELY PETITION FOR A
WRIT OF CERTIORARI CAN BE FILED ON THE ADVERSE JUDGMENT? AND IF
SO, DID THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR WHEN IT DECLINED
PETITIONER 'S MOTION TO APPOINT CJA COUNSEL AND VACATE ITS JUNE
29,. 2021, ADVERSE JUDGMENT, OF HIS CRIMINAL DIRECT APPEALS
REVIEW AND ISSUE A NEW ORDER SO THAT NEWLY APPOINTED CJA
COUNSEL CAN ASSIST PETITIONER WITH THE FILING OF A TIMELY
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI?
Remedy-for-CJA-attorney-failure-to-file-timely-cert-petition