Daniel Trejo v. Kathleen Allison, Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Mr. Treso was convicted in large Part vPON evidence made up bu the victim mother and manipulated by her Mr. Treso respectfully petitions this court For Petition certiorar, to review of the unPublish decision of the Fourth District court of Appeals Division twor affirming thesos conviction and Sentence. A Copy of the court of Appeals iS Attoched as Exibith A Here,isthe princiPal issue For review involves compeling lines of court of Appeal's decisions about the meaning of duress under Penal code 264 and 288
I Resdution of the split ana lead issve of state wide importance impacts both instrutional error claims Presented by Mr. TresO.
The staturoru definition of duress under Peralcode Section 269and 288 is analogous. (People V. Veale. (2008) 160 Lal,APP 44h 40.46 [Pen Code S288].
Whether the statutory definition of duress under Penal Code Sections 26 and 288 is analogous