No. 21-7635
William F. Kaetz v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-orders content-and-viewpoint-discrimination court-jurisdiction covid-19 covid-19-continuance due-process fraud-on-the-court judicial-authority public-debate unconstitutional viewpoint-discrimination
Latest Conference:
2022-06-02
Question Presented (from Petition)
Are the administrative internal court operation orders in response to the covid-19 pandemic an act that lacks authority, jurisdiction, due process, a fraud on the court, a content and viewpoint discrimination manipulating public debate about Covid-19 and therefore unconstitutional?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are the administrative internal court operation orders in response to the covid-19 pandemic an act that lacks authority, jurisdiction, due-process, a fraud-on-the-court, a content-and-viewpoint-discrimination manipulating public-debate about Covid-19 and therefore unconstitutional?
Docket Entries
2022-08-01
Rehearing DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-07-07
DISTRIBUTED.
2022-06-17
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-06-06
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-04-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 18, 2022)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
William Kaetz
William F. Kaetz — Petitioner