Charles Awusin Inko-Tariah v. United States
1. Was the Supreme Court ruling in Faretta vs California violated or trampled by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in denying Deaf/Blind petitioner his constitutional right to pro se self-representation as his 3rd court-appointed lawyer John Patrick Anthony. Esquire and the previous '2 Federal Public Defenders were not 100% committed to represent him to the be fst of their ability. Counsel Mr Anthdny is in the pocket of the government.
2. Was the Supreme Court ruling in Sell vs U.S trampled on by both the United States Court of Appeal For The District of Columbia Circuit as well as the trial court United States District Court For The District of Columbia in imposing excessive forced medication injection of powerful psychotropic drugs Haloperidol 150mQ-200ma (now 75ma) and ABILIFY MAINTENA (Aripiprazole 400mq) 2, 3 & 4 weeks 499 times and counting as well as anti-psychotic pills forced on him 4,690 times in 28 years (1994-2022) under the guise of mental health treatment plan. The government has a hidden agenda, ulterior motive and hidden plot (duress/extortion).
Was the Supreme Court ruling in Faretta vs California violated or trampled