WHETHER WHITE FEDERAL JUDGES OF THE EASTERN
DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI UNDER COLOR OF
MISSOURI LAWS WILLFULLY SUBJECTED PETITIONER BASED
ON HIS COLOR AND RACE TO A_ DEPRIVATION OF A
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF EQUAL PROTECTION OF MISSOURI
LAWS (HASLER, TIMEUS, McQUEEN) AS WELL AS EIGHTH
CIRCUIT LAWS (DENMON, ROSNOW).

WHETHER WHITE FEDERAL JUDGE RESPONDENT
LIMBAUGH UNDER COLOR OF MISSOURI LAWS AGREED WITH
WHITE STATE TRIAL JUDGES MARGARET M. NEILL AND
MICHAEL K. MULLIN TO CONFER JURISDICTION IN THE CASE OF
MISSOURI _V. HALL, NO. 0922-CR-01820-01 WHERE NONE
EXISTED ACCORDING TO SCHAEFFER.

WHETHER WHITE FEDERAL JUDGE RESPONDENT
LIMBAUGH A FORMER MISSOURI SUPREME COURT JUDGE IN
HIBLER IN 1999 AND COOPER IN 2007 UNDER COLOR OF
MISSOURI LAWS WILLFULLY SUBJECTED PETITIONER BASED
ON HIS COLOR AND RACE TO A DEPRIVATION OF HIS
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHS TO DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL
PROTECTION OF THE LAWS SECURED OR PROTECTED BY THE
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT TO THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION.

WHETHER WHITE FEDERAL JUDGE RESPONDENT
LIMBAUGH WHO WROTE THE OPINION OF MISSOURI LAW OF
HIBLER WAS AWARE OF MISSOURI SUPREME COURT LAW
McQUEEN IN 1955 AS FOLLOWED BY TURNAGE IN 1989 AND
BROWN IN 2000 OF A MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IN 2012.

WHETHER WHITE FEDERAL JDGE RESONDENTS
LIMBAUGH, NOCE, AND ADELMAN KNEW THAT UNDER
MISSOURI SUPREME COURT LAW TIMEUS IN 1911 THAT THE
GRAND JURY INDICTMENT 0922-CR-1820-01 WAS LEGALLY
INSUFFICIENT UNDER MISSOURI LAW (HASLER) AND EIGHTH
CIRCUIT LAW (DENMON) BY FAILING TO STATE AN OFFENSE
(ROSNOW) UNDER MISSOURI SUPRE,ME COURT RULE 23.01(b)2)
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE BY OMMITTING AN_ ESSENTIAL
ELEMENT OF "KNOWINGLY" OF MISSOURI CRIMINAL STATUTE
SUBSECTION 565.073.1(1) OF SECTION 565.073, RSMo (2000) SHALL
HAVE THE SAME FORCE AND EFFECT OF LAW UNDER MISSOURI
CONSTITUTION ARTILE V, SECTION 5.

WHETHER WHITE FEDERAL JUDGE RESPONDENT
LIMBAUGH KNEW THAT THE GRAND JURY INDICTMENT 0922CR-01820-01 WAS VOID THREATEN PETITIONER AN INNONCENT
BLACK MAN OF A WARNING THAT THE MATTER WAS CLOSED
VIOLATED UNITED STATES LAWS

WHETHER WHITE FEDERAL JUDGE CATHERIN D. PERRY
ENGAGED IN A CONSPIRACY WITH RESPONDENT LMBAUGH ON
SEPTEMBER 09, 2016 WHEN SHE ACKOWLEDGE THAT PETITIOER
ALLEGED THAT THE GRAND JURY INDICTMENT 0922-CR

Whether white federal judges of the Eastern District of Missouri under color of Missouri laws willfully subjected petitioner based on his color and race to a deprivation of a constitutional right of equal protection