WHETHER OR NOT JUDGE MCCLURE OF THE TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS, AFTER EXAMINING PETITIONER'S APPEAL, ERRED WHEN HE DETERMINED HE WOULD GRANT P.D.R.;

1. WHETHER OR NOT THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE 14th AMENDMENT WAS BREACHED WHEN THERE DO NOT PATENTLY EXIST SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO ESTABLISH EVERY ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE CHARGED;

2. WHETHER OR NOT THE COURT OF APPEALS ABUSED ITS DISCRETION WHEN IT FAILED TO "ABATE" APPEAL, AFTER BOTH THE STATE AND DEFENSE FILED A "JOINT MOTION TO ABATE APPEAL", AFTER DISCOVERY OF "NEWLY AVAILABLE EVIDENCE" OF EXCULPATORY DNA RESULTS, LINKING SOMEONE ELSE TO THE OFFENSE?

3. WHETHER OR NOT PETITIONER WAS DEPRIVED OF THE DUE PROCESS GUARANTEE WHEN TRIAL COURT PERMITTED INTO EVIDENCE THE NON-CORROBORATED TESTIMONY OF A JAILHOUSE SNITCH?

4. WHETHER OR NOT THE LOWER COURT ERRED AND ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN NOT DETERMINING THE TRIAL COURT VIOLATED THE "CONFRONTATION CLAUSE" BY PERMITTING "HEARSAY" TESTIMONY.

Whether the lower court erred in denying the petition for writ of certiorari