1) Whether Wype is ewttlet Yo Relief 02 av Eviherhiney heain
Whene Whe Lded Slates Coue of Appeals. SCaeut avd Whe
VUrled Ques Dishdiel Couet Loe Whe Coulthood Dataet of Texas
molated feceen\ Rights awd Wyle ght 4o Due Prees, hoy
wuposing a SAwchoo, pAekug his Petition of Acdun! Tuwocence
Accompawed by & Caw of Conefuhonal yYiolion, WERE Alewly
chseoverss evidence is preserseat AS Clear aud ame
evidence What is ero, Boenred Mronr Review avd ehers

2) Whether Wyre is entitled Yo rele? 02 ao Eviclevhinry haem,
whee She "denier engaged mW muscouduet, ww A Brooke
violation, by allowing peeyury teshmony from Une Shales vores,
a presevtence wveshoa0o (Ps Report Ghet Conlrins false
perjury _w9foua shor wnat Cooleadials and Cont eibuted Yo Vine
Conwichod , Were Whe iluoducing of Some SWORD Slefemect
Ghat Could uo! ioe cross-examwed at Yhe nending .

3) Whether Wyre is enttlel to Rehe? o2 Ao Evidenhany henesng,
whee ine, ConQontelion Clause Requires Saat & che Radiat
In A Cawnwal Case , be allowed +o impenth Vie credibility
of a orosecubiod oes were Whe ceferdavt wes Denied
"Due "Paoeess aqint sunrez Whe Ss" oy S eared i" Ameadmedks
and Sedeaa Rignt, prelawing vo bis Crimuel Cowvichod
Ghar is Bei Poor Lom Revieo aul zehel,

Whether Wype is entitled to relief on an evidentiary hearing