WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS APPROACH AND PRACTICE WHEN THE CERTIFICATE OF APPEAL AND ITS DOCKET CONTENT ARE SIGNIFICANTLY OUT OF STEP WITH RECENT SUPREME COURT LAW, RAISING DUE PROCESS AND ACCESS TO THE COURT CONCERNS, WHERE EMPIRICAL DATA AND RECENT STATISTICS DEMONSTRATE THAT NON-CAPITAL PRISONERS IN OTHER CIRCUITS ARE 61% MORE LIKELY TO GET A CERTIFICATE OF APPEAL VERSUS THAT NON-CAPITAL PRISONERS IN THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT?

WHETHER THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS COMMITTED ERROR IN DENYING THE MOVANT A "CERTIFICATE TO APPEAL" THE DENIAL OF HIS FED. R. CIV. P. 60 MOTION TO REOPEN WHERE *.

WHETHER PETITIONER'S COUNSEL FAILED TO PROVIDE EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL IN A CAPITAL CASE, FAILING TO PROPERLY INVESTIGATE FOURTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS, HIS FAILURE TO GIVE COUNSEL NOTICE, INCOMPETENT PERFORMANCE AFFIDAVITS NOT ATTACHED FOR THE SEARCH WARRANT COUNSEL WITH HIS FAILURE TO RECTIFY THE ASSISTANCE AND PRESENT FURTHER EVIDENCE FILING ON APPEAL UPON FRANKS HEARING WERE IN VIOLATION OF HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT.

WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURTS LACK JURISDICTION FOR TRANSITIVE COURTS RULE 60(B) MOTION A STATING COURT FOR COURT *.

WHETHER PETITIONER'S INDIRECT ANSWER OF COURT-LAST BOND COMPLEX CROSS ISSUE *.

WHETHER THE PETITIONER'S PREPARED PRESENTING OBJECTIONS CONCERNING COURTS BELOW, UPON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE TO APPEAL, DOES PETITIONER HAVE EQUAL PROTECTION AND EQUAL ACCESS TO THE COURT TO PROVIDE *.

WHETHER THE PETITIONER PREPARED PRESENTING COURTS BELOW UPON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE TO APPEAL, DOES PETITIONER HAVE EQUAL PROTECTION OF A BILL OF CLASSES ISSUE *.

WHETHER THE PETITIONER'S PREPARED PRESENTING COURTS BELOW UPON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE TO APPEAL, DOES PETITIONER HAVE EQUAL PROTECTION ISSUE *.

WHETHER THE PETITIONER PREPARED PRESENTING OBJECTIONS CONCERNING COURTS BELOW UPON MOTION FOR CERTIFICATE TO APPEAL, DOES PETITIONER HAVE PROCEDURAL DEFECT IN THE LOWER COURT OR SENTENCE PROCEDURAL DEFECT IN THE LOWER COURT OR SENTENCE PROCEDURAL RULE LOWER COURT SEPARATE THAT AS A FACTUAL MATTER 28 U.S.L. *.

Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals approach and practice in the Certificate of Appealability (COA) context are significantly out of step with binding Supreme Court law, raising due-process, access-to-court