Christopher Hibshman v. United States
1. For violation of supervised release is the imposition of a 24 month sentence consecutive to a 2 year Indiana prison term unreasonable and at odds with considerations required by 18 USC §3583(e) when the Sentencing Guidelines recommend a 7-13 month sentence, no new criminal conduct was found, and the statutory standards for revocation did not include punishment for the violation.
Whether the imposition of a 24-month sentence consecutive to a 2-year Indiana prison term for violation of supervised release is unreasonable and at odds with the considerations required by 18-USC-3583(e), when the Sentencing Guidelines recommend a 7-13 month sentence, no new criminal conduct was found, and the statutory standards for revocation did not include punishment for the violation