No. 21-7590

Stephen Izuchukwu Onwuzulike v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2022-04-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights deportation due-process immigration immigration-law judicial-discretion jurisdiction non-citizen-rights procedural-review standing takings
Latest Conference: 2022-06-02
Question Presented (from Petition)

Intexpretation ofimmigration juristiction

1. Inconsistency towards
Power o
1-130 application petition.

2 Due poe ation ouppsin poper appeppica
to create a falsified chasge ageinst the plaintiff who
Lomfully married to u's citizen.

3. Immigration judge lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate a case
thatis only Bit home jurisiction to decide because of
existing pending appeal of 1-130 application on uscis
decision.

A Dice used fabrication of charge by suppession of
I-1o appal appication to enable the imigationjue
Plaintif whe is Legally Maried te United state citizen.

5. Immigration judge refused to stop adjudication ofa case
that lis cowot lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate because
Uis only board of Immigraton (BiA) have
jusisdictron
to adjudicate o fending apfeal of 1-130
application:

not
Correcting
by
USaS
the wrongful adjudication of
^
the Immigration Judge
Onacase that it's Coust lacks
Iwsisdictron to decide.

7. Third Granit affirmed the decision of the
BIA Claim
thate they provided decision on pending
I-130 appea
to the plaintiff united state life
Without hwestigati
when a

third
does not Gonform wrth fedexal Cive procedure
evidence of BIA Claim that evidence
of accepting
plaintiff United state citizen
was issue tethe
becanse BlA never poovide the Cofy of Decision to
Third crtanie or plaintiff wrfe to protect the plaintiff
plaintaffand united state Citizen are blacks.

Third Crauie Court wsed wrong interpretation of fusisdiction
and due process to protect BiA and DHtslice which theplaintf
poimted out dwing his application for rehearing because
DHsfice used no pending appeal 1-13o to coaft a charge
to jail the plaintiff for six mariths, and exctend
a
Jurisdiction advantage to the Immigratron judge
to
deteomine unlanful deportation of the plaintiff.

Third Circnit En Bone refuse
to grant rehearing ef the
Plaintiff on issne of jursdictional eoror, falsified charge.
Suppressvon of existing I-130, falsified clarim used in
Refusal for a rehearing for Inconsistency with the
Suprem Cowt previons Lecisron on due process violation
and jurisdiction error which is a preplan
target
on a plaintipf becawse he is a black and a foreigner

2. Third Cranit En Bome refuse to rehear plaintiff petitior
application
agarinst miscarriage of justice wlich is
not in Conformance with Supreme Court cue process
detexminataon.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Due Process Clause prohibits the suppression of a properly filed appeal application

Docket Entries

2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-12
Waiver of right of respondent Garland, Att'y Gen. to respond filed.
2022-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 12, 2022)
2022-04-06
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.

Attorneys

Garland, Att'y Gen.
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Stephen I. Onwuzulike
Stephen Izuchukwu Onwuzulike — Petitioner