No. 21-7589
Mark A. Brown v. Bernadette Mason, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Mahanoy, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review burden-of-proof constitutional-rights criminal-conviction criminal-procedure due-process evidence reasonable-doubt
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2022-05-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Court of Appeals finding that the state Courts conviction was based on a reasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented deprived Petitioner of his constitutional right to due process of law by eliminating the requirement that the Government prove beyond a reasonable doubt?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Court of Appeals finding that the state Courts conviction was based on a reasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented deprived Petitioner of his constitutional right to due process of law by eliminating the requirement that the Government prove beyond a reasonable doubt?
Docket Entries
2022-05-16
Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2022-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-04-25
Waiver of right of respondent Mason, Supt., Mahanoy, et al. to respond filed.
2022-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Mark A. Brown
Mark A. Brown — Petitioner
Mason, Supt., Mahanoy, et al.
Nancy Winkelman — District Attorney's Office, Respondent