No. 21-7588
Gloria Marigny v. Centene Management Company LLC
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 28-usc-144 appellate-review bias civil-rights conflict-of-interest district-court document-admissibility due-process federal-procedure judicial-recusal standing summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-10-28
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
#1. Why Judge Brett Ludwig Denied Motion for Recusal, (Bias and Conflict of Interest was questionable)?
United States Eastern District Of Wisconsin, 28 U.S.C. § 144.
#2. What material, documents, audio, did Judge Ludwig determine inadmissible? Why was the information (omitted, concealed) material made visible to Plaintiff when decision was made on Summary Judgment?
United States Eastern District of Wisconsin.
#3. Did the Circuit Court review the Plaintiffs evidence before the Re-hearing was denied?
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Why Judge Brett Ludwig Denied Motion for Recusal
Docket Entries
2022-10-31
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner DENIED.
2022-10-12
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-06-30
Motion for leave to file a petition for rehearing filed by petitioner.
2022-05-16
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-04-13
Waiver of right of respondent Centene Management Company LLC to respond filed.
2022-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 11, 2022)
Attorneys
Centene Management Company LLC
Emery K Harlan — MWHLawGroup LLP, Respondent
Gloria Marigny
Gloria Marigny — Petitioner