WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERRED BY DENYING MR. HUDSON'S MERITORIOUS ARGUMENT THAT THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR BY IMPOSING A SENTENCE WHICH BOTH EXCEEDED THE ADVISORY GUIDELINE RANGE BUT ALSO RAN CONSECUTIVE TO CHARGES WHICH WERE PROSECUTED IN STATE COURT.

Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred by denying Mr. Hudson's meritorious argument that the district court committed reversible error by imposing a sentence which both exceeded the advisory guideline range but also ran consecutive to charges which were prosecuted in state court