present an argument of genvine dispute ldissagrement to officer cleveland
tl
indicent exposure andy thecelore admitedly the delendent to havino knowladye ot me
hoving commited o done the prong on wich the issve of justifiable arsrest to
have been hong lie the cosedecided).

3) Dose not the Gact that the district attorney involved/overseing the criminal
matter my claim was derived from viewed ftrvaliance footage of my actions on get
2oly and decided that they were not criminal of genvine dispute to defences cla
as presented in my brieit's to the district and appealet court's?
and hence, Should be comenced.

(5)7
really thought he saw plainti
f commit acrime onoctis
out side
Is.f or i& plaintiff commiled an act of conceate
2014
mavement why didint officer eleveland approach quection or ares
heag
right there and then. why did he have to spread nomerou
the plaintiff
difesent false
rdS Myrtle Ave,
walking pace past IisTy tou
exposore

Question not identified