Vitaly Kolosha v. Luke Pettigrew, Warden
/. oJtf-efit TtA¥ C&cs/LT M APBS A /2//fTk/<? v ?/+£>*-&
■ A IOO V&ArQs <s>U> 7F-EATy / LAU?,PfaG(l Pt/UdG, OH, A-CLT
of CettG&Mss / /£ 7T ActpOma-t/pa Ley faEr/^ActfuE y o/L
bO£S /T A-PPcy 70 &A-S&S& f7~ PS co*l Ft A. P7&S
OLh GtftSS ?
2, CcPdGd A STATE. OP Pc C/~(Z y ACTS UPbBiL A S>7~F7E CA-UJ
i/t OLATfUcY 77AS STATES STATEHFQh cJfA8-7BfZ_jCOft57t-nX>TtO^
FELbEfLAL- UACO , Adb Act OP Co*f£frESS , ?S /T Ad AcT
OF $&l>}~tiOAl A STATIC SB CBbh/Jc? F&OM THE tPATf&Af cOP /
STATE , Ok bOES TTfAT STATE OF Ft'CO./I / STfaPP^b OP F-c'S
Jl £ P/LS r QaCTA tT (/El Pott/E PS
dodsrf TC/T-tOtf / COMMlY Ad ACT (OF TR&A-S&d AGA^dST
TTE U.S"u/Ad" AGAr'dsr TAGOA bOSS / 7 &A/2.S Mr AT c£GAL STAddcdG
Me. Cf'rlrr /a7u>/2.pmy ?V
TO CSfFALL/FtfSE
3. ujftEA/ A PapsoM )S deta /'a/bd /d a state pUcSgk/
uicTH-OesT A l/AeI £) 0&be£_ OF COM Bd ~ FROM
A lalofcsl cOufaF M-Ai/rWc? <ru/L? s btcrto/T ro J^etav W
hf-tM t'S ( t a 22*41 &d 22S (P mattbtz P /
^, U9HAT i$ peoPBiE ilSMEby ttPH'Od (J<S t 3/ST/TP clF~
COC/faT PEFCSSss TO M&A/L CASS U/HE2.E A
JcfLy pe pcs sea to /Mbtcr pelt;t->om(Br ac/£>
OrfB y&A/E EA fE-P tME t) CSTrTc <l~ A-TTOR.tf/E.Y
P&D&FCUfTEZ)
When is a new religious word 190 years old treaty, law, prior ruling, or act of congress automatically retroactive, or does it apply to all cases as it reconfirms old ones?