ISSUE ONE:
Texas Penal Code §21.02 is Whether, in light of Ramos v. Louisiana
unconstitutional on its face?

ISSUE TWO:
Whether a trial court has jurisdiction to render a Penal Code
unconstitutional on its face; and thus a Defendant should not be
required to raise a frivilous objection in order to preserve a
facial constitutional challenge on direct appeal?

ISSUE THREE:
Whether the trial court is required to conduct a hearing out of the
presence of the jury to determine the admissibility of extraneous
offense evidence, or is a brief statement on the record regarding
the anticipated testimony sufficient?

Whether Texas Penal Code §21.02 is unconstitutional on its face