1) DID THE COURT AVOID CONSIDER THE ARGUMENT THAT THE SEPARATE GROUND INTERROGATORY IS AN ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT AND THAT THE JURY HAD NO KNOWLEDGE INFORMATION FROM THE STATE FOR SENTENCE ENHANCEMENT USING THE SEPARATE INTERROGATORIES? AND THAT WHEN THE SEPARATE INTERROGATORY HAS EXPLAINED AND DESCRIBED TO THE JURY AS THE ACT THAT CAUSED THE DEATH I.E JEOPARDY WAS NOT ONLY THAT THE SEPARATE INTERROGATORY WAS BEING ASKED OF THE MURDER CHARGES FOR A POSSIBLE SENTENCE ENHANCEMENT

2) IS THE SHOOTING OF THE GUN CONSIDERED THE ACT THAT CAUSED THE DEATH OF THE VICTIM WAS SHOT AND KILLED BY THE BULLETS OR PROSECUTORS WHAT KILLED FIRED FROM A FIREARM?

3) SHOULD A SEPARATE INTERROGATORY CONTROL A VERDICT WHEN IT PERTAINS TO AN ISSUE OF MATERIAL FACT IN A CRIMINAL CASE AS IT DOES WITH CIVIL?

Did the court err in considering the argument that the separate interrogatory is an issue of material fact and that the jury had no knowledge of information that the state presented for sentence enhancement?