(1) THE SENTENCING OF S.J.C.JR., TO THE H.C.A. PURSUANT TO K.S.A. 21-4504 ,WITHOUT ANY
LEGAL PROOF OF THE ONE PRIOR JUDICIAL COURT PROCEEDING OF THE STATE OF TEXAS ,BE A
VIOLATION OF U.S.CONST. ART. 4,SEC. 1; KAN. CONST. B. OF R. ,SEC. 10 ;

(2) THE SENTENCING OF S.J.C.JR., TO 45 YEAR'S TO LIFE , PURSUANT TO K.S.A. 21-4504 AS A
SECOND TIME OFFENDER, VIOLATED, THE KANSAS SUPREME COURT RULING'S ,AS' IMPLIED IN LAW ',AS
THE STATE STATUTE'S AND CASE LAW'S AUTHORIZE'S, WHICH VIOLATE'S ,U.S.CONST. ART. 4, SEC. 1;
U.S.CONST. ART. AMEND. 14; KAN. CONST. B.OF R. SEC. 10 ;

(3)THE WITH HOLDING OF FORENSIC EVIDENCE TO GET AN ORDER ; TO ORDER THE SECOND
RAPE CHARGES IN THE STATE'S INDICTMENT FOR ' T.N. ' ,VIOLATED K.S.A.60-455, K.S.A.22-3101, K.S.A.
22-2301, U.S.CONST. ART. 4 ,SEC.1 ; KAN. CONST. B.OF R. SEC.10 ;

(4) THE WITH HOLDING OF THE TESTING RESULT'S OF THE BLOOD AND OTHER BODY FLUIDS OF
' T. N. ' FROM THE JURY, WHICH IDENIFIY HER AS BEENING SEXUALLY TRANSMITTING DISEASE'S ,IN HER
TESTING'S PRIOR TO HER FILING THIS RAPE CHARGE AGANIST , S.J.C.JR., VIOLATED K.S.A.6O-455, K.S.A.
22-3101, K.S.A.22-2301, U.S.CONST. ART. 4, SEC. 1; KAN.CONST. B.OF R. SEC. 10 ;

(5)THE ' DNA ' TESTING ORDERED BY THE WYAN. CO. DIST. CT. OF KAN., CHIEF JUDGE IN 2019 ,
OF ALL THE EVIDENCE SAMPLE'S USED IN THE CRIMINAL TRIAL, ONLY SHOW'S ONE OF THE THREE DID
E A ' SX W INE ' ES E
SUBSTANTIVE CRIMINAL LAW'S OF THIS STATE OF KANSAS, THE STATE BE UNABLE TO SHOW THE
CE EE TE H E EH IEN TT TE T IT E
THE JURY, AS THE COURTS FINDING OF FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAWS ; AS SETFORTH IN SAID
JUDGMENT FORM, AS SAID JOURNAL ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN THIS CASE AT ' BAR ' ,BE A VIOLATION
OF U. S. CONST. ART. AMEND. 8 ,U. S. CONST. ART. AMEND. 13, U.S.CONST. ART. AMEND.14, KAN.
CONST. B. OF

Whether the sentencing of S.J.C.Jr. to the H.C.A. pursuant to K.S.A. 21-4504 without legal proof of a prior judicial court proceeding in Texas violates the U.S. Constitution and Kansas Constitution