No. 21-7512
Kevin E. Herriott v. Major Parrish, et al.
IFP
Tags: 8th-amendment civil-rights cruel-and-unusual-punishment cruel-unusual-punishment disciplinary-action due-process eighth-amendment excessive-force good-faith good-faith-effort law-enforcement
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-02
Question Presented (from Petition)
1) WHETHER PETITIONER GIVE DEFENDANTS PATQ OTICE OF WHAT THE CLAIMS ARE AND THE GROUND UPON WHICH IT RESTS?
2) WHERE OFFICERS VIOLATE THE RULE ANNOUNCED IN HUDSON V. MCMILLAN BY USE OF PHYSICAL EXCESSIVE FORCE ON THE PETITIONER WHO HAS PREVIOUSLY INVOKED THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO PROHIBIT CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT, UNDER THAT CIRCUMSTANCE DOES FORCE IS APPLIED IN A GOOD-FAITH EFFORT TO MAINTAIN OR RESTORE DISCIPLINE AND THEREBY PURGE THE TAINT FROM THE HUDSON VIOLATION?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether petitioner given defendants' notice of what the claims are and the grounds upon which it rests?
Docket Entries
2022-06-06
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-05-02
Brief of respondents Major Parrish, et al. in opposition filed.
2022-02-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 2, 2022)
2021-12-06
Application (21A204) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 4, 2022.
2021-10-15
Application (21A204) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 3, 2022 to March 4, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Kevin Herriott
Kevin E. Herriott — Petitioner
Major Parrish, et al.
Andrew Frederick Lindemann — Lindemann & Davis, P.A., Respondent