DID ALL THE COURTS ERR when FAILING TO CONSIDER THE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSIBILITIES OF PROVIDING ADEQUATE MEDICAL TREATMENT, WHICH APPELLANT ENDURED and CONTINUES TO ENDURE SUFFERING FROM THE DEFENDANT'S PECUNIARY INDIFFERENCE ON THE CONSIDERATION OF PROVIDING ADEQUATE MEDICAL CARE.

II. DID THE DEFENDANT'S DESERVE SUMMARY JUDGEMENT AFTER WATCHING PLAINTIFF SUFFER INDIFFERENCE TO HIS SERIOUS MEDICAL NEEDS.

III. OR DISMISS FOR "S" AFTER WATCHING PLAINTIFF SUFFER INDIFFERENCE TO HIS SERIOUS MEDICAL NEEDS OF DELIBERATE MEDICAL INDIFFERENCE TO HIS SERIOUS MEDICAL NEEDS.

Did the lower court err or abuse its discretion when granting summary judgment or dismissal before discovery was implemented, and based upon medical records never authenticated, and without defendants being ordered to provide medical records