No. 21-7492

In Re Jonathan Manwell

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2022-03-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: appellate-review confrontation constitutional-rights counsel-of-choice criminal-procedure discovery due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel forensic-evidence impartial-tribunal
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-05-26
Question Presented (from Petition)

DOES PETITIONER HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO LOCATED AND CONFISCATED EXCULPATORY FORENSIC EVIDENCE, TRANSCRIPTS AND DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR A MEANINGFUL OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT A COMPLETE AND ADEQUATE DEFENSE AND AN ADEQUATE AND EFFECTIVE APPEAL, ESPECIALLY WHERE ONES HAS BEEN DEPRIVED OF HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO AN IMPARTIAL TRIBUNAL, COUNSEL OF CHOICE, CONFRONTATION, AND EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL THROUGHOUT BOTH HIS TRIAL AND APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does petitioner have a constitutional right to located and confirmed exculpatory forensic evidence, transcripts, and documents necessary for a meaningful opportunity to present a complete and adequate defense and an adequate and effective appeal, especially where he was deprived of his constitutional right to an impartial tribunal, counsel of choice, confrontation, and effective assistance of counsel throughout both his trial and appellate proceedings?

Docket Entries

2022-05-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-02-17
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 28, 2022)

Attorneys

Jonathan Manwell
Jonathan Manwell — Petitioner