1. DID C.C.T. NOTHE EXPOSE THE PLAINTIFF TO DANGEROUS LIVINE HIS MASK APPROPRIATELY ? AS WELL AS MULTIPLE DEFENDANTS).

2. DID C.C.T. NOTHE ABUSE HIS OFFICIAL POWERS BY FALSELY WRITING A DISCIPLINARY REPORT AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF FOR VERBALLY EXPRESSING DISAPPROVAL OF C.C.T. NOTHE'S INSUBORDINATION TO WEAR HIS FACE MUSK AMONBST THE INMATES 1 DURING THE HEIGHT OF THE PANDEM3. DID LT.LEE PROPERLY EXECUTE PROCEDURALLY THE GRIEVANCE OF THE INMATE AGAINST C.C.T. NOTHE BU HIS RELUCTAUCE TO WEAR A MASK AMONGST THE INMATES?

O PN E RESTRICTIVE HOUSINO UNIT AND ATTENDANCE TO HIS STRIP SEARCH?

5. AFTER CONSIDERING THE PLANTIFF INDIGENT DID THE COURT VIOLATE ITS DISCRETION BU SEEKING A PAUMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF (SUPREME COURT JANUARY I9, 2O21 OF AN ATTORNEU WHEN IT WAS OBVIOUS HE COULD NOT PRESENT HIS CLAIM APPROPRIATELY. DID THE APPENL COURT VIOLATE THE 14 AMENDMENT BY DENY ING THE PLANTIFF EQUAL PROTECTIONS OF THE LAW?

DURING THE PANDEMIC?

8. DID STATE ACTORS DENU THE PETTIONER THE RIGHT NOT TO BE EXPOSED THROUGH DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE?

9. DID APPEAL COURT APPROPRIATELY CONSIDER EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO DOCKET NO. B:RO-EV-6BI (SRU) JULY G, 202O - OCTOBER 8, 2O20 B4 WHICH [PARTIAL]SUMMARY JUDGMENT LEAD COURT TO DISMISS THE CLAIM?

10 CV-631? DID APPEAL COURTS DENIAL OF OCTOBER 13, 2OZI DISCLOSED EVIDENCE OF t.

Did Gam E cE | ~ NoTKE expose the plaintiff to dangerous living conditions by his reluctance and insubordination to wear his mask appropriately?