Conflict

Whether the Seventh Circuit erred in holding, citing 338 U.S. 338 (1950), that the Due Process requirement of United States v. Vasquez is not required for violations of Title 10 United States Code, Section 1983(a), 355 U.S. 115 (1957).

Whether United States v. Vasquez, 638 Cir. 2010 violates the "Notice" requirement in Umbert v. California, 355 U.S. 015.

Whether the District Court, as affirmed by the Seventh Circuit, erred in finding that the petition under 10 U.S.C. § 1983(a), and repeatedly refused to acknowledge this Court's holding in 355 U.S. 215 (2015) in spite of numerous motions for reconsideration with right of habeas corpus of law.

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit entered a decision in conflict with the decision of this Court when it held in United States v. Vasquez, 611 F.3d 338 (7th Cir. 2010) that the Due Process requirement of 'Notice' is not required for violations of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2250(a)