No. 21-7470
Reggie Orlando Williams v. Texas
IFP
Tags: constitutional-law constitutional-rights criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment judicial-charging legal-procedure margin-of-error state-court state-prosecution
Latest Conference:
2022-05-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
\/OV\en '■WML o€ "Y&*aS -£<x\\eA 'V^ eAeoV
vJVucIa cJaargin^ -Vrtvvsaoticn °f -VVml oCCW# -V4 ,v€_
V> W»\)£- Cen\i\<ot«A uaQ$J\
O^s AV\e. scvw-e- re_sul-V fn a VroMiar) <?-£ outW
as gu<xra/\Ve^ 5^4 o-£
~^KQ_ U,S>. C^/isVrWViOO *SV*V* LuaS
'PeV^O'O ^O'T \aJ P\V Cqr^ovcxr\ ^>QgC \
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When the State of Texas failed to elect which charging transaction of the offense the State was going to have Petitioner convicted under, did this result in a violation of Double Jeopardy as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?
Docket Entries
2022-05-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
2022-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Reggie Orlando Williams
Reggie Orlando Williams — Petitioner