No. 21-7460
Eric Dean Smith v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3582 abuse-of-discretion compassionate-release criminal-procedure due-process sentencing
Latest Conference:
2022-04-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Did thE CouRts AbUsE it's DiscletiOw AftR Derying Me. SMith COMPASSIONATE RELEASEUNDER IBL. 13 AFER COUR CoNCudEd DEENdANt sAtisfiEd thE ExteoRdiNARY
2. Did tE COUt ER iN USEIN EREOUNS SAMENTS iN dEtERMiNiNg thE 355 3 (A) FACES ?
3. Did thE DiStict COURt ANd PROsECUtoR ViOlAtE DUE PRCESS by Not sEnding DEfENdANt thE DRdee & RESpONSE FoR Defehdant to reply to?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Courts Abuse Discretion in Denying Compassionate Release under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(1)(A)
Docket Entries
2022-04-25
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-03-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 25, 2022)
Attorneys
Eric Dean Smith
Eric Dean Smith — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent