I. Does the failure to give a self-defense jury instruction contradict, or is an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law regarding a defendant's due process and jury trial rights when self-defense was the crux of the defendant's case and the defendant introduced evidence to support the defense?

II. Should the Court summarily remand because the Sixth Circuit applied the lenient standard for certifying an appeal far too stringently?

Does the failure to give a self-defense jury instruction contradict, or is an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law regarding a defendant's due-process, jury-trial-rights, self-defense