No. 21-7443
Roberto Arenas-Tellez v. United States
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure district-court guideline-range holguin-hernandez-v-united-states judicial-discretion sentencing-guidelines substantial-arguments
Latest Conference:
2022-04-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether, after Holguin-Hernandez v. United States, _U.S.__, 140 S.Ct. 762
(2020), a party may obtain appellate relief when the district court fails to
reference or address substantial arguments for a sentence outside the
Guideline range, even if the party had not lodged a specific objection to the
court's failure to do so?
Whether a district court errs should reference or address substantial
arguments for a sentence outside the Guideline range?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a party may obtain appellate relief when the district court fails to reference or address substantial arguments for a sentence outside the Guideline range
Docket Entries
2022-04-25
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-03-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2022)
Attorneys
Roberto Arenas-Tellez
Kevin Joel Page — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent