No. 21-7438
Tramone Horne v. United States
Tags: burden-of-proof criminal-procedure due-process federal-sentencing federal-sentencing-guidelines judicial-discretion judicial-review preponderance-of-evidence sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2022-04-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should the Court require proof by more than a preponderance of the evidence of facts that significantly increase the defendant's sentence range under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should the Court require proof by more than a preponderance of the evidence of facts that significantly increase the defendant's sentence range under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines?
Docket Entries
2022-04-25
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/22/2022.
2022-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-03-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 21, 2022)
Attorneys
Tramone Horne
Kenneth Tableman — Kenneth P. Tableman, P.C., Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent