Does the presumption of Massaro v. United States, 538 U.S. 500 (2003) that ineffective assistance of counsel claims should be litigated in collateral proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 rather than brought on direct appeal apply where the claim was first litigated and decided in a considered, post-trial, prejudgment motion in the district court?

Does the presumption of Massaro v. United States apply where the ineffective assistance of counsel claim was first litigated and decided in a considered, post-trial, prejudgment motion in the district court?