No. 21-7408
Randy Dingle v. Talmage S. Baggett, Judge, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (3)IFP
Tags: 18-usc-242 42-usc-1983 case-coherence civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-interpretation legal-induction occurrence-analysis planned-action procedural-reasoning standing
Latest Conference:
2022-11-10
(distributed 3 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Although comparable occurrences appear to rehash the same thing, the conclusion should not be made that those occurrences are valid or impossible. Therefore, said occurrences can coherently uphold the induction that each of the episodes was the result of a planned action.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the occurrences in the case were the result of a planned action
Docket Entries
2022-10-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.
2022-10-21
Petitioner complied with order of May 16, 2022.
2022-10-03
Motion Denied.
2022-07-06
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
2022-06-23
Application (21A776) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 24, 2022.
2022-06-21
Application (21A776) for a further extension of time within which to comply with the order of May 16, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2022-06-10
Motion for leave to proceed as a veteran filed.
2022-06-01
Application (21A776) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 23, 2022.
2022-05-26
Application (21A776) for an extension of time within which to comply with the order of May 16, 2022, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2022-05-16
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 6, 2022, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2022-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-03-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-01-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 18, 2022)
Attorneys
Randy Dingle
Randy Dingle — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent