No. 21-7407
Janece Tisdel v. The Witness Protection
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure constitutional-law federal-jurisdiction government-disability legal-jurisdiction mandamus standing state-court subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2022-05-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
DQpS "ITE UfOITET> STATE'S COuPT of /VPTS
/\NP THB STATE'S T l STRICT COURT tf/hJB
SueJECT MaTTPR T U ft ISD (CT |OM? 51WCE A PSP. &oN
PPPp^AT (^'VI^RWMJEAJT f>'&G(yl[lflrf [/\ \s suu'JG- A
APU fiOEt) pOft KA'R'OA ivVU.S ^Tfle MATINS
tfPuPPlCp ^BtOfUG- ro lf+6 U5, P>sTP( cT 0004^0
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the United States Court of Appeals and the United States District Court have subject matter jurisdiction?
Docket Entries
2022-05-16
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-04-18
Waiver of right of respondent The Witness Protection to respond filed.
2022-02-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 18, 2022)
Attorneys
Janece Tisdel
Janece Tisdel — Petitioner
The Witness Protection
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent