1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has decided an important federal question in a way that conflicts with relevant decisions of the Supreme Court and also misapplied jurisprudence when it concluded that resolution to Petitioner's case was needed and dismissed all motions to the case without a hearing, and where equal rights are not secured, there is a deprivation of rights and it is a violation of the law (United States v. Price, 383 U.S. 787 (1966)). Though Petitioner filed a Civil Rights complaint in the United States District Court empowered by honorable Judge Kristi H. Johnson, can the Court pursuant to U.S.C. § 1983 vindicate his rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, to unseal an Agency's Order that contains prevailing evidence?

2. Whether the lower tribunal misapplied jurisprudence by concluding that acquiring or unsealing administrative decisions was not a decision of her Court to further the case as a matter of right, a question to be posed here is whether or not the State is entitled to the strongest legitimate view of the evidence and to all reasonable and legitimate inferences that may be drawn therefrom most favorable to the Petitioner's claim? Trent v. Wade, 776 F.3d 368, 376 (5th Cir. 2015).

3. The Petitioner suffered illegal incarceration and loss of financial prosperity for no valid reason under the law. If the Agency's Order is opened as a matter of record for this case, will it reveal civil rights violations against Petitioner under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

whether-the-united-states-court-of-appeals-for-the-fifth-circuit-has-decided-an-important-federal-question-in-a-way-that-conflicts-with-relevant-decisions-of-the-supreme-court