No. 21-7383
Francis B. Armah v. Janet Dowling, Warden
IFP
Tags: abrogation access-to-courts appellate-procedure certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas-corpus judicial-review pro-se pro-se-litigant supreme-court-precedent tenth-circuit
Latest Conference:
2022-05-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rendered an unreasonable application of Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631 (2010) without consideration of Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977), abrogated by Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (1996), when denying Petitioner Armah, a pro se litigant, a certificate of appealability?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rendered an unreasonable application of Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631 (2010) without consideration of Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977), abrogated by Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (1996), when denying Petitioner Armah, a pro se litigant, a certificate of appealability
Docket Entries
2022-05-16
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/12/2022.
2022-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2022)
Attorneys
Francis B. Armah
Francis B. Armah — Petitioner