Does a supervised release condition imposing "inpatient or outpatient"
participation in a treatment program constitute an impermissible delegation
of judicial authority if the condition leaves to the probation officer, not the
presiding district court judge, the ultimate decision whether to confine the
supervisee in an inpatient treatment facility?

Does a supervised release condition imposing 'inpatient or outpatient' participation in a treatment program constitute an impermissible delegation of judicial authority?