No. 21-7374
William A. Noguera v. Ronald Davis, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conflict-of-interest constitutional-right counsel-representation cuyler-v-sullivan holloway-v-arkansas ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel sixth-amendment successive-representation
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Ninth Circuit's opinion create a conflict with relevant decisions of this Court in concluding that Sullivan's standard applies only when a defense lawyer concurrently represents multiple clients with conflicting interests?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit's opinion create a conflict with relevant decisions of this Court in concluding that Sullivan's standard applies only when a defense lawyer concurrently represents multiple clients with conflicting interests?
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent Ron Davis, Warden to respond filed.
2022-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 14, 2022)
2021-12-21
Application (21A256) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 11, 2022.
2021-12-15
Application (21A256) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 10, 2022 to March 11, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Ron Davis, Warden
Meredith S. White — California Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
William A. Noguera
Celeste Bacchi — Federal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner