No. 21-7373
Steven M. Chapman v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: coram-nobis court-martial due-process legal-representation military-justice post-conviction post-conviction-relief standing writ-of-coram-nobis
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether or not Petitioner received full and fair consideration in the military justice system when his post-conviction efforts were summarily denied due to lack of counsel.
2. Whether or not it is a violation of due process for a military inmate to not be able to use a writ of coram nobis while imprisoned when his court-martial court has been dissolved.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Petitioner received full and fair consideration in the military justice system
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-23
Waiver of right of respondent Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II to respond filed.
2022-03-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Steven Chapman
Darlene Calzon Barror — Law Office of Darlene Calzon Barror, Petitioner
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent