No. 21-7367
Adam Shane Swindle v. S. Ma'at
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof certiorari-standard constitutional-interpretation court-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process habeas-corpus judicial-discretion pandemic-review record-review
Latest Conference:
2022-04-14
Question Presented (from Petition)
-fa be ■U- he y>un<^bej QlC\ Covid /7df iv*^ K* SK ould (Ama or 0<Xjsr\
V-i7t>t-V^eci ? 'p'C©
Vc' ^ "l 1_S>V yc>vjW £Kp, ( (Xtk 4-^eti ck'td Ooir Com^iH ?OC &tA ir"(v\<x
-SKooVd (}S>%Urrspr\-i&n% ? inirja-k he J>pr*'i d b>^5c d cjpon a*-,
'Dic^ 4-W. Ifcu/tT Court* —CflouS* 4WiT C^CY^kon htj Otff 4*cH k 4^<Record Onli^ 4-Ci cl^ '6 /''ftb/** (7rUd£?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should an inmate be punished for an act they could not have known to be prohibited?
Docket Entries
2022-04-18
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/14/2022.
2022-03-23
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Adam Shane Swindle
Adam Shane Swindle — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent