Raymond L. Rogers v. United States
(1). WHAT REMEDY IS AVAILABLE FOR PETITIONER WHEN HIS COURTAPPOINTED (CJA) ATTORNEY FAILED TO INFORM, ADVICE OR FILE
A TIMELY PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN DEFIANCE OF
PETITIONER'S WRITTEN REQUEST THAT A FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT'S
ADVERSE JUDGMENT BE CHALLENGED?
(2). DOES A CJA COURT-APPOINTED ATTORNEY'S CONDUCT OF FAILING TO
INFORM, ADVICE OR FILE A PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
AFTER AN ADVERSE DECISION BY A FEDERAL COURT OF APPEALS ON A
CRIMINAL DIRECT APPEAL MATTER CONSTITUTE AN EXTRAORDINARY
CIRCUMSTANCE TO RECALL A MANDATE AND VACATE THE JUDGMENT ONLY
TO REINSTATE THE JUDGMENT SO THAT A TIMELY PETITION FOR A
WRIT OF CERTIORARI CAN BE FILED ON THE ADVERSE JUDGMENT? AND IF
SO, DID THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR WHEN IT DENIED
PETITIONER'S MOTION TO RECALL A MANDATE SO AS TO ALLOW PETITIONER
HIS RIGHT TO FILE A TIMELY CERTIORARI PETITION TO CHALLANGE
THE TENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ADVERSE JUDGMENT OF HIS
CRIMINAL DIRECT APPEAL?
Remedy-for-CJA-attorney-failure-to-file-cert-petition