No. 21-7316
Richard Duerson v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: absent-witness confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process evidence-admission hearsay hearsay-testimony judicial-discretion judicial-proceedings just-conclusion officer-testimony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-02
(distributed 2 times)
Related Cases:
21-7307
(Vide)
Question Presented (from Petition)
OF THE CONFRONTATION CLAUSE?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
What obligation does the court have in allowing an officer to repeat an absent witness's statements which inculpate a defendant, over counsel's objection to the solicitation of hearsay, in assuring a just conclusion to the judicial proceedings as it relates to forfeiture of the confrontation clause?
Docket Entries
2022-06-06
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-05-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/2/2022.
2022-04-18
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-04-04
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022.
2022-03-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2022-03-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 7, 2022)
Attorneys
Richard C. Duerson
Richard C. Duerson — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent