1. Whether the trial court erred be admitting, without'expert
medical testimony, evidence of the complainant's stomachaches
and bladder pain puporting to corroborate her allegations of
sexual assault?

2. Whether the commonwealth deprived the defendant of his sbate
and federal due process rights where the trial prosecutor (a)
grossly misstated the first complaint witness's testimony in
closing argument^ ](2) Violated the bar against Successive co
complaint testimony^' and (3) Improperly vouched for the first
complaint witness and the complainant?

3. Whether the cumulative effect of the trial errors, all
of which tended'to bolster the complainant's uncorroborated
allegations, deprived therdefendant of his state and federal
due process rights and require a new trial?

Whether the trial court erred in admitting evidence without expert medical testimony