No. 21-7304
Wilfredo Torres v. New York City Police Department, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process judicial-ethics judicial-misconduct presidential-power standing torture-allegations warrantless-search warrantless-surveillance
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2022-04-29
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether United States Judge Ronnie Abrams and United States Magistrate-Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox violated rules of ethics and my right to due process of law when they capriciously dismissed lawsuits 16CV2362 and 16CV3437 about warrantless raids of my apartment to kill me, kidnapping, and torture which had been ordered by the then President of the United States Barack Obama as part of the Deep State-CIA-FBI-COINTELPRO domestic assassinations program.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether United States Judge Ronnie Abrams and United States Magistrate-Judge Kevin Nathaniel Fox violated rules of ethics and my right to due process of law
Docket Entries
2022-05-02
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2022-04-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2022-03-21
Waiver of right of respondent NYPD, et al. to respond filed.
2022-03-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 7, 2022)
Attorneys
NYPD, et al.
Devin Andrew Slack — New York City Law Department, Respondent
Wilfredo Torres
Wilfredo Torres — Petitioner