I.
WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED ERROR BY
ORDERING THE DEFENDANT TO GO FORWARD WITH CLOSING
ARGUMENT WITHOUT STANDBY COUNSEL LANDES BEING
PRESENT IN THE COURTROOM AND AVAILABLE TO ASSIST THE
DEFENDANT DURING HER CLOSING ARGUMENT AND THE
GOVERNMENT'S CLOSING ARGUMENT AND MR. BROWN'S CLOSING
ARGUMENT?

II.
WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED ERROR BY FAILING
TO GRANT THE DEFENSE'S MOTION FOR SEVERANCE, RENEWED
MOTION FOR SEVERANCE DURING THE TRIAL SINCE JOINDER OF
DEFENDANTS WAS PREJUDICIAL TO THE SUBSTANTIAL RIGHT OF
THE DEFENDANT TO A FAIR TRIAL?

III.
WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT COMMITTED ERROR WHEN IT DID
NOT SUA SPONTE OBJECT TO THE GOVERNMENT'S CLOSING
ARGUMENT THAT TAXPAYER'S FUNDS WERE BEING SPENT ON THE
FRAUDULENT ACTIVITY BY THE DEFENDANT?

whether-the-district-court-committed-error-by-ordering-the-defendant-to-go-forward-with-closing-argument-without-standby-counsel